ed milliband

[eboswan]

why does he look more like a spitting image puppet than a possible future prime minister
I just cant listen too his nostril voice

[Geordie]

His brother definitely wins in the looks dept, but I'm slowly warming towards him as a politician.
That don't take a lot as I'd rather have Ken Dodd than Cameron and his sidekick Clegg.

[Blackbaronfish]

His brother definitely wins in the looks dept, but I'm slowly warming towards him as a politician.
That don't take a lot as I'd rather have Ken Dodd than Cameron and his sidekick Clegg.

Be careful what you wish for

BBF

[Axelrod]

Always wanted to vote Labour . Never been able to afford it. dave

[Gixxerboy]

In all honesty I don't think you could make one good one out of all of them put together.

[Blackbaronfish]

If you reduced their pay and benefits I wonder how many would still want to carry on because "they want to make a difference" and have your best interests at heart

BBF

[raygun]

If you reduced their pay and benefits I wonder how many would still want to carry on because "they want to make a difference" and have your best interests at heart

BBF

I feel a little different.

I think that M.P's should have a 25% pay increase. Then their number reduced by half. That would give them more money and save us money. The House of Lords should be reduced to 100 Peers but they could keep their attendance allowance. That would leave over 400 people to Govern us Nationally. The USA can do it with a similar number but a 5 times greater population.

We would save money and have less earache

ATB
Ray.

[Timmytree]

If you reduced their pay and benefits I wonder how many would still want to carry on because "they want to make a difference" and have your best interests at heart

BBF

I feel a little different.

I think that M.P's should have a 25% pay increase. Then their number reduced by half. That would give them more money and save us money. The House of Lords should be reduced to 100 Peers but they could keep their attendance allowance. That would leave over 400 people to Govern us Nationally. The USA can do it with a similar number but a 5 times greater population.

We would save money and have less earache

ATB
Ray.

Put them on an hourly rate and only pay for attendance in the house.

[granville]

paid by results , save us load and nothing to pay if they did not get the country back in credit.

[Phil B]

If you reduced their pay and benefits I wonder how many would still want to carry on because "they want to make a difference" and have your best interests at heart

BBF

I feel a little different.

I think that M.P's should have a 25% pay increase. Then their number reduced by half. That would give them more money and save us money. The House of Lords should be reduced to 100 Peers but they could keep their attendance allowance. That would leave over 400 people to Govern us Nationally. The USA can do it with a similar number but a 5 times greater population.

We would save money and have less earache

ATB
Ray.

The US - the finest government that money can buy!