Air Arms Owners Club

If the chilcot report is as damming as we presume should tony blair be prosecuted for war crimes?

Interesting point, I watched that Colonel Tim Collins on TV last night and he said that even Saddam thought he had weapons of mass destruction. He ordered his scientists to make loads of them and on fear of death they convinced him that they had.
However, when UN weapons inspectors couldn't find any and our scientist was found dead in dubious circumstances it makes you wonder if the figures were fiddled doesn't it?

It's an interesting report, not that i have read any of the 2.4 million words, i think its about £30 for a copy. i did hear on the radio that some of the fanilies
involved are seeking legal help regarding the result's.
Ok Blair made the decission but what about all those behind giving him the wrong information, how far down the line do you go.
daz

The printed summary will cost £30:00, if you want the entire printed report of twelve volumes as well it is an additional £767:00.

Have you noticed on the news reports, they keep showing a pile of volumes and they are all missing volume VIII.

For those who may be interested, all the documents can be viewed and or downloaded here:-

http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-report/

Having read none of it yet, I can't help but wonder if there is any mention of the Petrodollar which Saddam refused to deal in, he wanted to sell the oil in Euros, essentially the Petroeuro, which directly conflicted with the Petrodollar and all that it entails. This would have had a devastating effect on the American economy (read National Security), an economy that was/is verging on collapse. Toppling Saddam would effectively destroy the Petroeuro threat. You can't invade a country because of a challenge to the monopolising Petroldollar, but you might if they have WMD's and you can invade before a third party proves they haven't.
I doubt it.

Messrs Blair and Bush should be up on war crimes charges in front of an international court ! Do Russia have weapons of mass destruction, did we invade them ? There is a lot more to this saga than we are told, the "puppet masters" have been pulling the Western leaders strings for years.

Mason wrote:For those who may be interested, all the documents can be viewed and or downloaded here:-

http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-report/

Having read none of it yet, I can't help but wonder if there is any mention of the Petrodollar which Saddam refused to deal in, he wanted to sell the oil in Euros, essentially the Petroeuro, which directly conflicted with the Petrodollar and all that it entails. This would have had a devastating effect on the American economy (read National Security), an economy that was/is verging on collapse. Toppling Saddam would effectively destroy the Petroeuro threat. You can't invade a country because of a challenge to the monopolising Petroldollar, but you might if they have WMD's and you can invade before a third party proves they haven't.
I doubt it.

My sentiments entirely... but, the man is a self proclaimed expert on all things "Middle East" and I am so utterly relieved to learn that his actions have made the world a better place , I am certain it was good "strategery"