Just read this on the BBC.
Interesting that it proposes a "simple test" to define the lethality of a projectile based on kinetic energy.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35104969
Neil
Review of firarms laws
Review of firarms laws
S400 Classic .22
Beretta 682 Gold E 30" O/U M/C
Sabel SxS 28" F/C
CZ 455 Varmint .22lr SAK moderator
Beretta 682 Gold E 30" O/U M/C
Sabel SxS 28" F/C
CZ 455 Varmint .22lr SAK moderator
- Blackbaronfish
- Posts: 3691
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 6:20 pm
- Location: Nuneaton
Re: Review of firarms laws
Lets hope they follow it through and actually come up with something
BBF

BBF
Did I mention that I'm the only one to have attended EVERY meet since we started
- Katzenjammer
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:09 am
Re: Review of firarms laws
Some of this was in the Select Committee report from a while back and a lot of shooters and representative organisations agree there needs to be a review of the number of laws and the collation of them. This is slow work - the recent Consumers Rights legislation demonstrates this where a number of laws were brought together.
Time consuming as it is it must be done. Failure to streamline various laws into one lead to potential conflicts between different laws if research is not rigorous or even myths being perpetrated amongst the less well informed.
In regards to airguns there is no doubt the word capable needs removing in relation to power limits.
Time consuming as it is it must be done. Failure to streamline various laws into one lead to potential conflicts between different laws if research is not rigorous or even myths being perpetrated amongst the less well informed.
In regards to airguns there is no doubt the word capable needs removing in relation to power limits.
ATB
Steve
Member since Autumn 2007
Steve
Member since Autumn 2007
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests