Pellet efficiency
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2015 3:27 pm
We often hear that heavier pellets are more efficient in PCPs and lighter ones better in springers. Is it time that theory was chucked out of the window? Personally I think it's more to do with pellet fit and hardness for a PCP and similar for a springer but add to that the balancing act between piston weight/preload and seal tightness.
I've just spent an hour in the barn firing pellets through the combro (still in one piece!) with the S200 and the Prosport, pellets used were my favourite AA Fields and Falcon Accuracy plus which PaulrBarnard, the previous owner of the S200 found most accurate.
You all know my PS has been intensively fiddled with, now I've had a little play with the S200 so testing was needed.
5 shots through the PS first to get things moving and then 12 over the chrono, discount 1 high and 1 low to leave a string of 10.
AA Fields.
776. 776. 774. 776. 775. 775. 776. 774. 776. 774. Gives me 11.2 ftlbs.
Falcon AP
819. 818. 822. 818. 818. 819. 819. 818. 819. 820. Gives me 10.9 ftlbs
Next the S200. Middle of the sweet spot at 130 bar.
AA Fields
783. 782. 782. 782. 783. 781. 784. 782. 784. 784. Gives me 11.4 ftlbs
Falcon AP
824. 821. 820. 819. 822. 820. 824. 821. 824. 823. Gives me 10.9 ftlbs.
So for me at least, the AA Fields are more efficient and give more power in both rifles. The S200 suggests the theory is right and the PS proves it is wrong!
I have to admit that the Falcon AP feel very nice in the PS, slightly better than AA Fields but nowhere near as accurate at anything over 40 yards. It looks like I might have to try a tin of the AA Field Express although I do begrudge the price of the damn things. Either that or I have to start having to play with piston weights again to try and make the Fields feel as nice during the shot cycle.
I've just spent an hour in the barn firing pellets through the combro (still in one piece!) with the S200 and the Prosport, pellets used were my favourite AA Fields and Falcon Accuracy plus which PaulrBarnard, the previous owner of the S200 found most accurate.
You all know my PS has been intensively fiddled with, now I've had a little play with the S200 so testing was needed.
5 shots through the PS first to get things moving and then 12 over the chrono, discount 1 high and 1 low to leave a string of 10.
AA Fields.
776. 776. 774. 776. 775. 775. 776. 774. 776. 774. Gives me 11.2 ftlbs.
Falcon AP
819. 818. 822. 818. 818. 819. 819. 818. 819. 820. Gives me 10.9 ftlbs
Next the S200. Middle of the sweet spot at 130 bar.
AA Fields
783. 782. 782. 782. 783. 781. 784. 782. 784. 784. Gives me 11.4 ftlbs
Falcon AP
824. 821. 820. 819. 822. 820. 824. 821. 824. 823. Gives me 10.9 ftlbs.
So for me at least, the AA Fields are more efficient and give more power in both rifles. The S200 suggests the theory is right and the PS proves it is wrong!
I have to admit that the Falcon AP feel very nice in the PS, slightly better than AA Fields but nowhere near as accurate at anything over 40 yards. It looks like I might have to try a tin of the AA Field Express although I do begrudge the price of the damn things. Either that or I have to start having to play with piston weights again to try and make the Fields feel as nice during the shot cycle.