1.77 versus .22 Question..

User avatar
Raj
Posts: 2005
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:36 pm
Location: Rugby

Re: 1.77 versus .22 Question..

Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:10 am

poguemahone wrote:
maddoghutty wrote: have a word with a pathologist who has experience of gunshot wounds, i did :lol:


Whaaaaaat ???? :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: You shot Edna with a .177 !!!! ?? :cry: :cry: :cry:
“It's the Indian, not the arrow"

no avatar
eboswan
Site Admin
Posts: 3223
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:16 am
Location: swansea

Re: 1.77 versus .22 Question..

Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:58 am

You could have shot edna with a howitzer ....the rippling folds of fat would have absorbed the shot.....
IS MY SIGNATURE BIGGER THAN RAYS. Cz 452 american .22+sak mod
S200. .177

no avatar
zippy
Posts: 355
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 7:23 pm

Re: 1.77 versus .22 Question..

Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:11 pm

Raj wrote:But Zippy ... Arent you forgetting that .22s have so much more power left down range compared to .177s? And on a windy day, isnt a .22 so much better for holding its course as it doesnt get blown about so much? All that stuff you said about better technology and better accuracy ... surely, the same company that makes the nicer .177s also makes really nice .22s so I really think .22s are better, mate. :twisted:



Forget about hunting for a moment here..... And we are using sub 12 fpe. and topic is based on the use of sub 12fpe

I did a test in reasonable weather conditions, and this test was 100% true, at the 80,yard range at our club,,, I placed two 3" inch shoot un see targets with tiny bulls-eye's out at the 80 yard line, laser measured. using two tx200hc one in.177 cal the other .22, the results were much easier too achieve any sort of groups at that range with the .177 rifle rather than the .22

The theory here is that with .22 been slow velocity it stays in the air longer before reaching the target therefore having more wind pushing at it to stray it from the target and of course more dreaded holdover ect... this kind of balance's things out using the .177 as it is faster flight time to the target and flatter trajectory.

If you look at most 100, meter air rifle shooting, this sport more Favored in other country's, if look at this 100,meter yard shooting they all use .177 cal for good reason and they are using light weight pellets like JSB exact express.

more accurate Shot placement from the .177 will out do the heaver .22 caliber. and the extra holdover and drop is annoying and frustrating at longer ranges when using the .22 and this is why? most air rifle competitions sports like HFT, FT all favor and use .177 cal... there is a valid reason here and this makes .177 even more desirable caliber too own as it can be used for HFT and FT competitions.

It seems so silly to pay more money for .22 pellets,,, when .177 is more enjoyable too shoot at longer ranges with less drop and holdover and under along with been able to use .177 for most air rifle shooting sports like HFT, FT... :D

Well, put this way HFT, FT is a hunting simulated competition... and they are using .177 cal... :lol:.... says it all really.
Air Arms tx200hc, mtc taipan, 4-16X50
Air Arms tx200hc, falcon menace, 4-14x44 FFP
Air Arms Pro-sport, mtc mamber
Air Arms TDR, falcon menace 10x44
HW 100t falcon menace 4-14X44 FFP
HW 100t richer optics
HW 97KT
HW 45 Geordie custom grips
Alecto

no avatar
Dr B
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:28 pm

Re: 1.77 versus .22 Question..

Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:42 pm

zippy wrote:Forget about hunting for a moment here.


To be honest my friend, I'd rather not as hunt is all I do. This is the crux of the issue. As I have said previously, out to 35-40yds there is no difference in accuracy between .177 and .22 - sub 5p groupings for both no problem for a modern PCP. These distances are typical hunting distances and airguns were never designed to kill beyond these ranges. Now, target shooting competitions are a different beast - but any differences above 40yds are irrelevant to the hunter (assuming they truly exist).

I did a test in reasonable weather conditions, and this test was 100% true, at the 80,yard range at our club,,, I placed two 3" inch shoot un see targets out at the 80 yard line, laser measured. using two tx200hc one in.177 cal the other .22, the results were much easier too achieve any groups at that range with the .177 rifle rather than the .22

You'd need to do a bench rest test and cover a long of variables for this to be a scientific test.

The theory here is that with .22 been slow velocity it stays in the air longer before reaching the target therefore having more wind pushing at it to stray it from the target and of course more dreaded holdover ect... this kind of balance's things out using the .177 as it is faster flight time to the target and flatter trajectory.

It has little to do with wind per-se, its gravity having more time to pull the pellet down. Truth is the .22 will nearly always have a higher ballistic coefficient as well, less affected by wind and retaining more of its energy downrange.

Shot placement will out do the heaver .22 caliber. and the extra holdover and drop is annoying and frustrating at longer ranges.

No, you're assuming you cant do shot placement with .22, but you most certainly can. Ask my freezer.... :mrgreen:

I think calibre debates should be banned from forums. As some of the chaps have already said, put the pellet in the right place and its all over. Let's just enjoy the sport.
AA S410 .22, Classic Walnut Thumbhole stock, Hawke 4-12 x 50 Panorama IR/AO/EV
AA S410 .22 Carbine (Cloverleaf Tuned) Walnut stock, Hawke Airmax 30, 4-16 x 50mm IR
AA TX200Hc .22, Walnut stock, Simmons 3-9 x 50mm.

no avatar
mark holding
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:07 pm

Re: 1.77 versus .22 Question..

Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:28 pm

As long as you know your abilities and your rifles abilities at various ranges, it doesn't matter. Shooting is a combination of a lot of things and has to take into account the environment, weather, distance and ability and principles of marksmanship. Happy shooting. Its all about having fun.

User avatar
Raj
Posts: 2005
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:36 pm
Location: Rugby

Re: 1.77 versus .22 Question..

Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:36 pm

zippy wrote:
Raj wrote:But Zippy ... Arent you forgetting that .22s have so much more power left down range compared to .177s? And on a windy day, isnt a .22 so much better for holding its course as it doesnt get blown about so much? All that stuff you said about better technology and better accuracy ... surely, the same company that makes the nicer .177s also makes really nice .22s so I really think .22s are better, mate. :twisted:



Forget about hunting for a moment here..... And we are using sub 12 fpe. and topic is based on the use of sub 12fpe

I did a test in reasonable weather conditions, and this test was 100% true, at the 80,yard range at our club,,, I placed two 3" inch shoot un see targets with tiny bulls-eye's out at the 80 yard line, laser measured. using two tx200hc one in.177 cal the other .22, the results were much easier too achieve any sort of groups at that range with the .177 rifle rather than the .22

The theory here is that with .22 been slow velocity it stays in the air longer before reaching the target therefore having more wind pushing at it to stray it from the target and of course more dreaded holdover ect... this kind of balance's things out using the .177 as it is faster flight time to the target and flatter trajectory.

If you look at most 100, meter air rifle shooting, this sport more Favored in other country's, if look at this 100,meter yard shooting they all use .177 cal for good reason and they are using light weight pellets like JSB exact express.

more accurate Shot placement from the .177 will out do the heaver .22 caliber. and the extra holdover and drop is annoying and frustrating at longer ranges when using the .22 and this is why? most air rifle competitions sports like HFT, FT all favor and use .177 cal... there is a valid reason here and this makes .177 even more desirable caliber too own as it can be used for HFT and FT competitions.

It seems so silly to pay more money for .22 pellets,,, when .177 is more enjoyable too shoot at longer ranges with less drop and holdover and under along with been able to use .177 for most air rifle shooting sports like HFT, FT... :D

Well, put this way HFT, FT is a hunting simulated competition... and they are using .177 cal... :lol:.... says it all really.


Zippy, I am not complaining or anything ................................. but I cant believe you took the bait, mate. Hang on a minute ... now I am the one being wound up here, arent I ??? :lol: :lol: :lol:
“It's the Indian, not the arrow"

User avatar
Raj
Posts: 2005
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:36 pm
Location: Rugby

Re: 1.77 versus .22 Question..

Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:38 pm

Dr B wrote:I think calibre debates should be banned from forums. As some of the chaps have already said, put the pellet in the right place and its all over. Let's just enjoy the sport.


Nooooooooooooooooooooo .. Dr.B !!! Where is the fun in that? ;)
“It's the Indian, not the arrow"

no avatar
poguemahone
Posts: 688
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 10:36 am
Location: stoke

Re: 1.77 versus .22 Question..

Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:26 pm

Raj wrote:Whaaaaaat ???? :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: You shot Edna with a .177 !!!! ?? :cry: :cry: :cry:

eboswan wrote:You could have shot edna with a howitzer ....the rippling folds of fat would have absorbed the shot.....

well, i'd almost got over the sheer joy and elation of losing Edna, my dear mother in law, then you 2 come along and cheer me up again :lol:
i keep having flashbacks to when i saw her in her open coffin. one of the neighbours said to me, ''doesnt she looks lovely wearing those mink gloves'' ??
i said ''she's not wearing any gloves'' :shock:

no avatar
eboswan
Site Admin
Posts: 3223
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:16 am
Location: swansea

Re: 1.77 versus .22 Question..

Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:18 pm

poguemahone wrote:
Raj wrote:Whaaaaaat ???? :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: You shot Edna with a .177 !!!! ?? :cry: :cry: :cry:

eboswan wrote:You could have shot edna with a howitzer ....the rippling folds of fat would have absorbed the shot.....

well, i'd almost got over the sheer joy and elation of losing Edna, my dear mother in law, then you 2 come along and cheer me up again :lol:
i keep having flashbacks to when i saw her in her open coffin. one of the neighbours said to me, ''doesnt she looks lovely wearing those mink gloves'' ??
i said ''she's not wearing any gloves'' :shock:


One of the neighbours said ....how the hell do they expect too close the lid with that wooden stake sticking out of her chest :shock:
IS MY SIGNATURE BIGGER THAN RAYS. Cz 452 american .22+sak mod
S200. .177

no avatar
Dr B
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:28 pm

Re: 1.77 versus .22 Question..

Sat Feb 06, 2016 12:38 am

poguemahone wrote:the extra velocity of .177 causes a greater ''temporary wound cavity'' than the .22, so the damage done by both calibres is the same.


Sorry, but this is simply incorrect. The .22 makes a much larger lateral wound channel. I dont believe in calibre debates, but i do believe in the information people use is accurate. :mrgreen:
AA S410 .22, Classic Walnut Thumbhole stock, Hawke 4-12 x 50 Panorama IR/AO/EV
AA S410 .22 Carbine (Cloverleaf Tuned) Walnut stock, Hawke Airmax 30, 4-16 x 50mm IR
AA TX200Hc .22, Walnut stock, Simmons 3-9 x 50mm.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests