Blackbaronfish wrote:When I filled out the part asking "what can BASC do for airgunners", I told them to sort the ANTI TAMPER out so that owners don't get caught with their pants down![]()
Tell them straight![]()
BBF
I said the same thing.
Blackbaronfish wrote:When I filled out the part asking "what can BASC do for airgunners", I told them to sort the ANTI TAMPER out so that owners don't get caught with their pants down![]()
Tell them straight![]()
BBF
eboswan wrote:Blackbaronfish wrote:When I filled out the part asking "what can BASC do for airgunners", I told them to sort the ANTI TAMPER out so that owners don't get caught with their pants down![]()
Tell them straight![]()
BBF
I said the same thing.
Timmytree wrote:Not sure but wasn't it the AMTA that presided over the A/T fiasco?
Timmytree wrote:Not sure but wasn't it the AMTA that presided over the A/T fiasco?
raygun wrote:Timmytree wrote:Not sure but wasn't it the AMTA that presided over the A/T fiasco?
Quite correct Tim.
I don't think you could get a fag paper between them though.
This latest SA thing just shows them up for what they are. It also shows exactly where their spokesman stands as far as airgunners go.
We have the classic "give me a ring and I'll tell you exactly what's going on". This happened with AT and it's happening again with the SA problem.
If there's nothing to hide WHY NOT POST WHAT THE REASONS ARE.
ATB
Ray.
air gun wrote:why did I just spend 10 mins filling that out.
raygun wrote:air gun wrote:why did I just spend 10 mins filling that out.
Because your very slow.![]()
It took the rest of us just two minutes![]()
ATB
Ray.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests