Ok, understood, have never appraised on feel (neither noise, twang etc) my only criteria have ever been:
Lack of sight picture movement (ability to view pellet flight path and strike)
Consistency of fps (particularly between cool / warm conditions)
Longevity / robustness of components / engineering
Dave Price's TX tune is certainly a much softer feel (no surprise given the specs) but, for sight picture movement comes in behind the very light, ally, o-ring option of Nick G.
Good luck with your quest and thank you again for the videos.
How to make my TX shoot like I want
Re: How to make my TX shoot like I want
TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10-50x60
TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10x42
TX200 test / analysis gun
TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10x42
TX200 test / analysis gun
Re: How to make my TX shoot like I want
GrandadG wrote:Sake-san wrote:I am lead to understand that you already know Nick Gibney, just drop in his light ally o-ring bits and be prepared to be amazed.
If you would like more background and info on my own TX tuning journey feel free to PM me, or pop down for a weekend to shoot, appraise, eat and drink.
Got you at last Sake![]()
Was it a typo?![]()
![]()
or too much wine?
Good grief you are alert (a good thing as Britain needs lerts!)
The case for the defence hinges upon the clever and subtle use of the word lead (aka Pb, AN 52) linked to the subject matter of shooting small projectiles composed principally of said material. May it please the assembled court.
In reality of course it is the cursed auto text spell check gizmos which become even more frustrating when you try to type at speed each day in two or more languages.
I shall dust off the dunces hat and stand in the corner for a suitably corrective period of time.

TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10-50x60
TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10x42
TX200 test / analysis gun
TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10x42
TX200 test / analysis gun
Re: How to make my TX shoot like I want
Sake-san wrote:Ok, understood, have never appraised on feel (neither noise, twang etc) my only criteria have ever been:
Lack of sight picture movement (ability to view pellet flight path and strike)
Consistency of fps (particularly between cool / warm conditions)
Longevity / robustness of components / engineering
Dave Price's TX tune is certainly a much softer feel (no surprise given the specs) but, for sight picture movement comes in behind the very light, ally, o-ring option of Nick G.
Good luck with your quest and thank you again for the videos.
Yep - I know what you mean. I also have some of those snappy guns with very little sight picture movement - but it can also be achieved another way and its that one I want to try this time

The videos will keep coming - well thats if I do things I think are interesting enough that other people might want to see

Re: How to make my TX shoot like I want
Do please keep us informed 

TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10-50x60
TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10x42
TX200 test / analysis gun
TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10x42
TX200 test / analysis gun
Re: How to make my TX shoot like I want
Sake-san wrote:GrandadG wrote:Sake-san wrote:I am lead to understand that you already know Nick Gibney, just drop in his light ally o-ring bits and be prepared to be amazed.
If you would like more background and info on my own TX tuning journey feel free to PM me, or pop down for a weekend to shoot, appraise, eat and drink.
Got you at last Sake![]()
Was it a typo?![]()
![]()
or too much wine?
Good grief you are alert (a good thing as Britain needs lerts!)
The case for the defence hinges upon the clever and subtle use of the word lead (aka Pb, AN 52) linked to the subject matter of shooting small projectiles composed principally of said material. May it please the assembled court.
In reality of course it is the cursed auto text spell check gizmos which become even more frustrating when you try to type at speed each day in two or more languages.
I shall dust off the dunces hat and stand in the corner for a suitably corrective period of time.
Ok Sake

HW100T .177
AA Prosport .177
AA S200 .177 Huma Reg
AA Prosport .177
AA S200 .177 Huma Reg
Re: How to make my TX shoot like I want
Sake-san wrote:Do please keep us informed
Of course!

Re: How to make my TX shoot like I want
Perhaps just another 10 minutes, I quite like it here 

TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10-50x60
TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10x42
TX200 test / analysis gun
TX200/Gary Cane/Sightron SIII 10x42
TX200 test / analysis gun
Re: How to make my TX shoot like I want
Sake-san wrote:GrandadG wrote:Sake-san wrote:I am lead to understand that you already know Nick Gibney, just drop in his light ally o-ring bits and be prepared to be amazed.
If you would like more background and info on my own TX tuning journey feel free to PM me, or pop down for a weekend to shoot, appraise, eat and drink.
Got you at last Sake![]()
Was it a typo?![]()
![]()
or too much wine?
Good grief you are alert (a good thing as Britain needs lerts!)
The case for the defence hinges upon the clever and subtle use of the word lead (aka Pb, AN 52) linked to the subject matter of shooting small projectiles composed principally of said material. May it please the assembled court.
In reality of course it is the cursed auto text spell check gizmos which become even more frustrating when you try to type at speed each day in two or more languages.
I shall dust off the dunces hat and stand in the corner for a suitably corrective period of time.
Not wishing to nit pick



The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool
- Blackbaronfish
- Posts: 3691
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 6:20 pm
- Location: Nuneaton
Re: How to make my TX shoot like I want
You guys crack me up
.
Neil are you looking for the result in .22 or .177
BBF



Neil are you looking for the result in .22 or .177
BBF
Did I mention that I'm the only one to have attended EVERY meet since we started
Re: How to make my TX shoot like I want
Blackbaronfish wrote:You guys crack me up![]()
![]()
.
Neil are you looking for the result in .22 or .177
BBF
177 mate
All my guns are 177 apart from the project HW80 I did just for an experiment
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests